Showing posts with label Tolerance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tolerance. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

A time for introspection for Muslims


 


A time for introspection

Muslim moderates have to figure out how to defend equality and democracy against religious arguments for hierarchy and theocracy

Saad Hafiz

·         Saad Hafiz

·         March 08, 2015

 There is a growing desire to understand the root causes of Islamic extremism. This is a natural reaction to the unspeakable horrors that transnational terrorist groups, including the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Boko Haram (translated as western education is forbidden) and Daesh or the Islamic State (IS) are carrying out against innocent people, the majority of whom are Muslims. It is recognised that extremism now poses the greatest challenge to universal human values and world peace.


President Obama has suggested that economic and political grievances are responsible for violence and terrorism in the Muslim world. Mocked by his Republican opponents, Obama encouraged democracy and prosperity to combat militancy. Grand Imam Ahmed al-Tayeb, the head of Al-Azhar, Sunni Islam’s most prestigious seat of learning, linked extremism to “bad interpretations of the Quran and the sunnah”, which have led some people to embrace a ‘misguided’ form of Islam. Al-Tayeb’s rare and candid admission was diluted when he went on to blame unrest in the region, on a conspiracy of “new global colonialism allied to world Zionism”.




Unfortunately, the facts are that the forms of Islam gaining ascendancy — certainly those most influential world affairs today — are the extreme, intolerant forms. It is no longer sufficient to just blame longstanding injustices and twisted ideologies for the brutal atrocities committed by ‘fringe’ Islamic groups. Many (but not all) of the problems facing the Muslim world are indeed self-inflicted, and blaming the west for all of them has set Muslims back from the path of enlightenment.

A major issue is that Islam lacks the traditions that encourage questioning and scepticism, and the test of knowledge through the prism of rationality. Muslims easily succumb to pre-dominant, irrational discourse and actions. Perhaps we can draw hope in the words of linguist and translator Thomas Cleary who said: “Islam does not demand unreasoned belief. Rather, it invites intelligent faith, growing from observation, reflection and contemplation, beginning with nature and what is all around us.” Sadly, most Muslim societies do not allow the freedoms necessary for public introspection and dialogue. At this point it is very difficult to envision reform in the Muslim world that focuses on the maturity and reason of humankind.

It is unhelpful that, for political reasons, partly, rulers of Islamic kingdoms (like past Christian kings) describe themselves as “shadows of God on earth”. This sends out an unequivocal message: anyone contradicting the ruler is also contradicting God. In order to make sure that the populace remains compliant, they construct the image of a God for whom obedience is paramount. To this very day, this plays an important role in dictatorial Islamic states, where any opposition is not only held up as a secular opposition, but also as a movement against God. People defer to the rulers when they have questions about what they should and should not do. Repressive structures intermingle as a result. Christianity has succeeded in overcoming this incapacitation of the faithful. That has not quite been the case in Islam.


Also, most Muslims do not concern themselves with the true essence of the Quran. That is why many Muslims often base the faith on what they are told. We hark back to statements made by theologians in the ninth and 10th centuries. Muslims need to fight the literalism and obscurantism being promoted in many mosques, in religious schools or during courses of theological instruction. It is also too often the case that the lives of Muslims are cloaked with a fatalism based on a misunderstanding of God’s will. In the closed, fearful world of Islamic discussion, a discourse on these issues is considered offensive, dangerous or both. Muslims who mention it are branded disloyal and subjected to intimidation and violence. Reformers who interpret the Quran differently, who say Islam is more than just a religion of rules and regulations, have so far not succeeded in asserting themselves.


Muslim moderates have to figure out how to defend equality and democracy against religious arguments for hierarchy and theocracy. The appeal of radical religious doctrine and practice is obvious today, and needs to be understood if we are to persuade people that religious zealotry is frighteningly unappealing. We should recognise the power of the extremists and the extent of their political reach. We should clearly name the fanatics our adversaries and commit ourselves to an intellectual campaign against them; that is, a campaign in defence of liberty, democracy, equality and pluralism. If Muslims expect religious tolerance, we must ourselves enforce a zero-tolerance policy against hatred and bigotry.


All the great religious civilisations are capable of producing violent fanatics and all faiths in their extreme form carry the possibility of tyranny. However, Islam today seems most susceptible to this malady. Muslims have to step up to the forefront of the struggle for political and religious tolerance, social cohesion and inclusiveness. As a start, this process should consist of two parts. First, do not blame external forces for all your ills. Second, be inclusive and compassionate towards other human beings regardless of their faith because that is what our beneficent and merciful God has willed the believers to do.


The writer can be reached at shgcci@gmail.com

 

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Muslim Takeover of West Bengal, India



February 22, 2015

The Muslim Takeover of West Bengal


 

Riots, restrictions on speech and religion, and the takeover of politics and law enforcement are just a few of the unwelcome changes that can be expected in non-Muslim societies as Muslim immigrants increase in number, according to Dr. Peter Hammond.  A Christian missionary based in South Africa and author of 40 books, Hammond delineates how Muslims change societies in his book, Slavery, Terrorism and Islam.  Citing examples of countries worldwide, Hammond outlines typical activities that occur as the Muslim percentage of the total population increases.  It is a warning bell about the gradual, step-by-step changes that can be expected in other countries still undergoing significant Muslim immigration.

These societal changes occur because devout Muslims are bound by a 1,400-year-old doctrine of immigration originating in Islamic scriptures and based on Mohammed's migration from Mecca to Medina. Under the religious edict or Hijra, Islamic expansionism and submission of all non-Muslims to shariah or Islamic doctrine must occur.  Islamic expansionism and its counterpart, jihad, are first expressed as Muslim demands for special status and privileges within the host country.  A higher percentage of Muslims in the host country can soon translate into Muslim control of political processes, law enforcement, media, and the economy, as well as restrictions on freedom of movement, speech and religious practices. The appropriation of goods and property, as well as violence with impunity, can also occur.    

The situation in at West Bengal in Hindu-majority India, bordering Muslim-majority Bangladesh, illustrates the inherent problems to non-Muslim societies of a growing Muslim population.

West Bengal

Bengal, an ethno-cultural region, was politically divided in 1947 during the partitioning of British India into independent India and Pakistan.  Under this arrangement, the Bengal province was carved in two: the predominately-Hindu West Bengal, a state of India, and the predominately-Muslim East Bengal, which became a province of Pakistan and, in 1971, the Muslim-majority country of Bangladesh. 

At partitioning, the Muslim population of West Bengal stood at 12% and the Hindu population of East Bengal 30%.  Today, with massive Muslim immigration, Hindu persecution and forced conversions, West Bengal’s Muslim population has increased to 27% (up to 63% in some districts), as per the 2011 census and Bangladesh’s Hindu population has decreased to 8%.  While the situation for Hindus in Bangladesh is certainly dire, life has become increasingly difficult for Hindus in West Bengal, home to a Muslim-appeasing government and a breeding ground and safe haven for terrorists. For several years, West Bengal has suffered under apparent Muslim-planned riots designed to implement shariah, extract government concessions and grab more territory. 

Kolkata Riots

In 2007, a violent protest broke out in Kolkata (formerly known as Calcutta) against Bangladeshi feminist author, physician and human rights activist, Taslima Nasreen. The demonstrations against Nasreen were a thinly veiled attempt to institute Islamic blasphemy laws and curtail freedom of speech. 

Nasreen, who was born a Bangladeshi Muslim but chose atheism, had witnessed the horrific treatment of Islamic women in her medical practice, and advocated for freedom of expression, women’s rights, non-Muslim rights and abolition of shariah law.  In 1993, she published a novel, Lajja (Shame) about a Hindu family persecuted by Muslims.  The novel ignited a furor in the Muslim community, which called for a ban on the book and offered a bounty for her death.  The novel was subsequently banned by Indian authorities.  Nasreen was physically attacked, went into hiding and escaped from Bangladesh to Europe.  After 10 years’ exile, she returned to the east and settled in Kolkata.  Her Bangladeshi passport had been revoked and she waited several years for a visa to be able to visit India.  While in Kolkata, she continued to write articles critical of Islam despite renewed threats and calls for her beheading.

In November 2007, a protest organized by militant Muslims against Nasreen led to riots as Muslims blocked traffic, pelted police and journalists, torched cars and damaged buses.  Similar to the justification for the Charlie Hebdo murders in Paris, West Bengali Muslims protested the violation of shariah blasphemy law, which mandates death for anyone who dares to criticize Islam.  The army was forced to intervene, Nasreen was placed under house arrest and later forced to leave the area.  The banned Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and the Pakistani Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) were believed to have fostered the mayhem.

Canning District Riots

In 2013, Muslims in West Bengal were actively lobbying for a second partition of India to create an Islamic super state – Mughalistan – that would incorporate Pakistan, Bangladesh and parts of India.  Meanwhile, ethnic divisions were also stirred up by an upcoming local election.  Into this charged situation, the murder of a Muslim cleric by unidentified assailants sparked outrage among Muslims, as thousands mobilized for rioting in the Canning District.  An article in a popular weekly publication, Organiser, called the attack “a well organized and meticulously planned attack on Hindus.”  Over 200 Hindu homes were looted and firebombed, hundreds of temples and idols destroyed, and vehicles set on fire amid shouts of “Allah-hu Akbar!”  Repeated calls for help by Hindus went unanswered by the police.  Local residents claimed authorities were complicit with the Muslim mobs.   

Violence in Usti

This January 29th, in a market in the Kolkata suburb of Usti, more than 50 Hindu shops were ransacked, looted and gutted by rampaging jihadists.  Police mostly watched as bombs were hurled at Hindus indiscriminately.  They fired a few random shots into the air and detained victimized Hindu shop owners while their attackers roamed free. A legislative assembly member and the state minister for minority affairs reportedly demanded that local police release the few rioters held in custody. There was limited reporting by the mainstream media that didn’t specify the Muslim identity of the perpetrators and West Bengal’s Chief Minister, Mamata Banerjee, issued no statement about the violence.  Independent sites, Indiafacts and Hindu Samhati, reported the incident with numerous photographs.

Political Implications

With a 27% Muslim population, enough pressure exists to tip the scales for elected officials precariously toward advancement of an Islamist agenda and make Muslims the most privileged class in West Bengal.  In some areas, such as the border district of Murshidabad, which is over 63% Muslim, de facto shariah is imposed on all residents.  The vast majority of political candidates, elected officials and law enforcement leadership are Muslim and the economic prospects for Hindus dim as Muslims refuse to patronize non-Muslim businesses.

Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who has received official visits from Hillary Clinton and several U.S. ambassadors, offers a prime example of a political leader who expediently favors Muslim constituents, capitulates to their many demands and entices them with special benefits and privileges.  The reality of Muslim vote bank politics, whereby an entire Muslim community votes along lines dictated by the local imam or religious leader, adds to the problem and furthers Muslim control of the state.  Banerjee has gone so far in her Muslim sympathies as to publicly recite the Kalima Shahadat, the Islamic conversion prayer, in front of an audience of imams.  

Because West Bengal’s Muslims were largely responsible for her election as chief minister, Banerjee has made substantial payback.  She approved and validated the academic degrees of 10,000 previously unrecognized Saudi-funded and controlled madrasas (Islamic colleges) four minarets (Muslim towers), honorariums for imams and an exclusively Islamic township. Banerjee called for the establishment of Muslim medical, technical and nursing schools with special subsidies for Muslim students, as well as Muslim-only hospitals.  She has favored Muslims to the extent of distributing free bicycles and rail passes to female Muslim students and laptops to Muslim boys.  Banerjee’s political party, the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC), will most likely send more Islamists to serve in parliament in the future.  Reportedly, jihadist sleeper cells inhabit the area under her protection.  Meanwhile, the needs of Hindu refugees from Bangladesh are ignored, even as they continue being victimized in West Bengal.


In June of 2014, Mamata Banerjee made a highly questionable appointment, Rajya Sabha, to the upper house of the Indian Parliament.  Despite multiple warnings from the District Intelligence Bureau that had red-flagged him for instigating violence against Hindus, including alleged participation in the Kolkata and Canning riots and sheltering known terrorists, she selected Pakistani Hassan Imran to serve as MP. Imran is a founder and self-admitted member of the radical student group, the Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI), a recognized terrorist organization banned by the Indian government.  He founded and edited a radical weekly magazine, Kalam, which he later turned into a daily newspaper, Dainik Kalam, and sold to the Saradha Group, a financial conglomerate with ties to West Bengal government officials. The publication has advocated for the establishment of Muslim-controlled areas in the state under shariah.  Hassan has close ties to local Islamist leaders and has worked with Jamat-e-Islami (JI), a pro-Saudi jihadist group supported by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).  He also has ties to a chief official of the Islamic Development Bank, a Saudi entity that has financed Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood affiliate, the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR), an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism funding trial in the United States.  JI and the ISI have been linked to efforts to take over the Indian state of Assam and separate it from India. 

The Saudi-funded terrorist group Jamaat-ul-Mujahadeen, also linked to MP Hassan Imran, has a major base in West Bengal, including bomb-manufacturing units, and has used Wahhabi money to build mosques throughout the state.  The Muslim call to prayer is blasted by loudspeaker from early in the morning to late at night and some thoroughfares in the Muslim districts of Kolkata are closed to all traffic for Friday prayers.

Recently, Hassan and other associates of Mamata Banerjee were implicated in a financial scandal – a Ponzi scheme with the Saradha Group – and things are starting to unravel for the chief minister.  A major investigation of a consortium of 200 private companies that collected between $4 – 6 billion from over 1.7 million depositors before it collapsed, may bring down her reign in West Bengal.  Her MP appointee, Hassan, is believed to have acted as a liaison between Jamaat-e-Islami and the money launderers.

Bangladesh

Hindus of West Bengal need only look across the border to Bangladesh to see their future if Muslim immigration continues and the Muslim population exceeds the current 27%. In Bangladesh, with an 89% Muslim population, ethnic cleansing persists unabated, Hindu land is forcibly captured and Hindu homes and businesses looted.  People are commonly beaten with no police intervention.  Hindus have been tortured and forced to pay the jizya, a tax that non-Muslims are required to pay for protection against Muslim terrorism.  Hindu girls, even married women, have been raped, mutilated, kidnapped, enslaved and forced to marry Muslim men.  Law enforcement authorities are often complicit in the activities and provide no protection or recourse.  Victims are typically threatened if they report incidents to the police. Often, in the case of abduction, police refuse to register complaints and make claims that consensual intercourse has taken place even if the girl is 9 or 10 years old, a non-minor under Islamic standards.  

Kidnapped Hindu girls who manage to escape report that they were taken to Muslim families in which relatives and friends were invited to rape them over several days while Muslim women facilitated the encounters. 

This dire future could possibly be avoided in West Bengal, where some speculate that the Saradha financial scandal could go far in exposing Mamata Banerjee’s dangerous ties to Islamists who seek to wrest control of West Bengal from Hindus.  If her government falls as a result, it could be the wake-up call needed to turn the current situation around.  It could also serve as an example to other countries facing increasing Muslim immigration and increasing imposition of Muslim values on non-Muslims.

 

Attachments area




https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif

https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/mediatype/icon_2_youtube_x16.png


https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif

 

Friday, May 2, 2014

BHBCUC, USA’s Meeting with the US Ambassador to Bangladesh, New York, March 2014


Press Release

For Immediate Release

New York

March 17, 2014

BHBCUC, USA’s Meeting with the US Ambassador to Bangladesh,

His Excellency Dan W. Mozena Held

Dear Minority Rights Advocates/Activists:

Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist & Christian Unity Council, USA is held a meeting with the US Ambassador to Dhaka the Honorable Dan W. Mozena on Sunday, March 16, 2014 at the Gulshan Terrace of Woodside, Queens, New York City. Ambassador Mozena accompanied by two Department of State officials, Dr. Erick Eide and Mr. Christopher Elms, arrived promptly at 9: 45 AM and were greeted by 350 to 400 members of the Bangladeshi-Americans belonging to various Hindu, Buddhist and Christian organizations, a dozen print media and TV cameras (BHBCUC, USA apologizes to the scores of people who, responding to our invitation, enthusiastically came there braving the Sunday morning cold to express their solidarity with the victims of religious & ethnic cleansing in Bangladesh and let the Hon. Ambassador know that America must act to protect them).

Seated on the stage were the three co-presidents of the organization Dr. Jiten Roy, Mr. Julius Gomez and Mr. Ranabir Barua, the Honorable Ambassador Mozena and the two other State Department officials: Dr. Erick Eide and Mr. Christopher Elms. And, the meeting was very efficiently conducted by the organization’s Vice Chairman/Board of Director and an articulate speaker Mr. Bidyut Das.

The meeting started with Anandita offering the ambassador a bouquet of flowers and President Julius Gomez offering him a gift on behalf of BHBCUC, USA.

Figure 1Ambassador Mozena with Presidents Dr. Jiten Roy & Mr. Julius Gomez

Ambassador Mozena was introduced by young Attorney Rakesh Roy and Professor Dastidar by Mr. Akash Das, an intern of BHBCUC, USA. All the presentations were supported by relevant Power Point slides containing pictures portraying atrocities as well as data, which were prepared and/or projected on the screen simultaneously with the speech by BHBCUC, USA Advisor Mr. Ranjit Roy.

The speakers included Distinguished Professor of SUNY Old Westbury Campus, Dr. Sachi Ghosh Dastidar, Dr. Dwijen Bhattacharjya, Lecturer in Bengali/Columbia University, Mr. Amit Chowdhury, Director Policy, Mr. Rup Kumar Bhowmick, Director Communications & Publications, and Ms. Sathi Roy.

Following the welcome address by Mr. Amit Chowdhury, Director Policy, Mr. Rup Kumar Bhowmuck, Director of Communications & Publications, apprised the audience of the fact that BHBCUC, USA was a politically non-aligned Human Rights advocacy group, focused only on helping the religious & ethnic minorities of Bangladesh regain their equal rights and the right to live in their ancestral homeland, Bangladesh, with human dignity and safety of life and property. He pointed out that this organization brutally honest when it comes to presenting facts about which political party or its leaders & cadres have played what role in this on-going state-sponsored campaign of religious & ethnic cleansing in Bangladesh.

In presenting the Position Paper on behalf of the organization, Dr. Bhattacharjya ( henceforth “the paper”) started out by arguing that the vicious campaign of blatant discrimination and religious & ethnic cleansing that has raged in Bangladesh for decades, has been a state sponsored, goal-oriented and targeted campaign. The paper substantiated the claim by citing Kennedy Report of November 1971, Sydney Shanberg’s (NY Times Dhaka correspondent in 1971 who is world famous for his role in “Killing Field”) reports, both of which says that particularly the Hindus were targeted in 1971 – their houses were marked “H,” reminiscent of what the Nazis did to the Jewish population during World War-II.

Then by referring as well as showing in slides such notices served by the Islamists’ as “Leave Bangladesh or face dire consequences,” “Islam has been declared state religion, and therefore you must convert to Islam or leave the country,” “Hindus must convert to Islam if they want to vote., etc.,” including in January 2014, the paper argued that the campaign has always been driven by the Islamic nationalist’s and extremists goal of ridding the country of its minorities through violence.

By describing select heart rending cases of atrocities that occurred between 1988 and 2014, e.g., that of the Logang Massacre of the indigenous people on April 10, 1992 by Prime Minister Begum Zia’s armed forces and Muslim settlers (referring to the letter that 17 US Congressmen wrote Prime Minister Begum Zia expressing concern it was stated that 600 residents of that village were systematically killed after raping their women and looting their dwelling houses), the Banskhali Massacre, the slaughtering of the internationally famous Buddhist monk Gnanajyoti Mahasthabir, Principal Muhuri, the celebration of their election victory by the cadres of BNP and Jamaat-
e- Islami by raping 200 girls in one night (The Daily Star Editorial), and the case of rape-murder where they urinated in the mouth of dying person begin for a drop of water, the paper further argued that when the deadly combination of BNP and Jamaat-E- Islami returns to power Bangladesh becomes a “killing field” for its minorities as well as the secular Muslims (the case of the cadres of BNP gang raping a secular Muslim girl after their election victory in 2001 was cited).

Although everything that was included in the Position Paper was shown in the Power Point slides along with the presentation, the Hon. Ambassador was also provided two books: one our own publication Bangladesh: a portrait of covert Genocide (2004) and Professor Barakat’s book (about the effects of Enemy Property Act on the minorities), in which such documents as the letter that 17 US Congressmen wrote to Begum Zia in November 1992, expressing concern over the Logang Massacre, the Kennedy Report of 1971, the Shanberg Report, American Taliabn John Walker Lindh’s interview with CNN On Line etc., were conspicuously flagged.

Referring to Professor Barakat’s resercah the paper Dr. Bhattacharjya told the audience that BNP and Awami League both seized the highest quantiy of peroperty during the time they were in power, and, thus, there is little difference among parties when it comes to minority persecution/cleansing.

Upon firmly establishing that the minorities have been persecuted regardless of which party has been in power, varying only in terms of the degree of intensity, the paper argued that while the goal of the Islamic extremists ( Jamaat, Shibieer and its allies) behind this campaign has been to (i) rid the country of its “infidel” population, i.e., the Hindus, Buddhists and Christian including the indigenous peoples, so the country could be turned into a monolithic Islamic; the goal of the Islamic nationalist BNP has been also been the same for a different reason: reduce Awami League’s vote bank by 14%, so it could never win the parliamentary election again. The Awami League’s goal has been totally different -- by not preventing or stopping pogroms by using the the police or armed forces, when the attacks are conducted against the minorities, it has always wanted to show the world how evil BNP and Jamaat-E- Islami are. Thus, to all the parties the minorities are simply an expandable commodity, and not human beings like them.

The paper then pointed out how BNP reinstated the killers and murderers of 1971 into politics and started the process of Islamizing Bangladesh through the passage of the 5th amendment and how Lt. General Ershad firmly established Islam as the state religion through the 8th Amendment, thus rendering the minorities as 2nd rate citizens and other religions as less important. It also pointed out that Awami League and its so called secularist allies put a permanent seal on the issue by reaffirming what Lt. General Ershad had done to the minorities by passing the 8th Amendment or the State Religion bill. Dr. Bhatatcharjya argued that by taking this unthinkable backward action Awami League reverted to its original character that it had when it was born as the Awami Muslim League.

The paper further argued that Bangladesh experienced an astronomical rise in Islamic militancy during the BNP-Jamaat rule between 2001 and 2006. It pointed out that Prime Minister Begum Zia - Nijami’s government provided shelter to the shipload of Al-Qaeda soldiers who entered Bangladesh by M. V. Mecca after the fall of Kandahar.

By citing the American Taliabn John Walker Lindh’s interview with CNN On Line, the paper pointed out that they sent a full Brigade of Bangalee jihadists to Afghanistan to fight alongside Bin Laden’s’ Ansar Al Islam and the Urdu speaking Pakistani brigade. He clearly told the Ambassador that the combination of BNP and Jamaat is lethal one, which brought Bangladesh to the brink of being turned into a semi Taliban state. The paper citing two famous reports established that Islamic Chatra Shibeer is the third most danger non-governmental armed terrorist group in the world and hence must be banned along with Jamaat-E- Islamic, which is its funding source.

He said that in 1971 it is today’s leaders of the Jamaat-E-Islami who collborated w ith the pakistani army in the killing of 3 million unarmed civilians raping of 200, 000 women and the exodus of nealry 10 million people to India, majority of whom were minorities. Pointing out that a lot is being said about the trial of the War Criminals, but BHBCUC, USA holds the postion that if anyone is found guilty of crime agsint humanity in during the war or afterwards, that person must be brought to justice like the Nazis are being tried and punished if found.

The paper also pointed out how the minorities were shocked and stunned again and again by the centrist party of Awami League and its secular democratic allies. This included reference to the Father of the nation Bangobondhu’s refusal to return the Ramna Kali Temple to the Hindus after liberation, deliberate failure to to repeal the Enemy Property Act (thus allowing successive government seize 2.8 million acres of land from the minorities), and create Hindu, Buddhist and Christian Foundations along with the Islamic Foundations that he had created through legislation.

He criticized the Bangobondhu government for looking the other way when the Islamic nationalists & extremists desecrated deities and temples during the Durga Pooja in October 1972, thus signaling to the Islamists that minority persecution was all right in secular democratic Bangladesh as it had been in Islamic Pakistan.

The paper accused Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government for all the above plus her failure to prosecute the perpetrators of crime against the minorities despite the existence Shahabuddin Commissions’ report which lists thousands of them.

He also pointed out how it took decades before the minorities got access to the Ramna Kali Temple and finally repeal the Enemy or Vested Property Act, under tremendous international pressure, which was still an exercise in chicanery in that the losers of property , unlike the Jews of Nazi Germany or the Armenians of Turkey, cannot reclaim their property. He also criticized Prime Minister Hasina for her failure failure to take decades before addressing the issues only under tremendous international pressure (e.g. rebuilding the Buddhists Temples under international pressure but not the hundreds of Hindu Temples that have been destroyed). The position Paper also criticized Prime Minister Hasina for her failure to implement the Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord of 1997 that she herself had signed.

The paper pointed out that although whenever a minority candidate was nominated they won the parliamentary election, e.g., 14 in the 2008 election, the centrist Awami League and its allies refuse to nominate them, and that there is not single cabinet minister in the current cabinet, whereas in India there have been several Muslim Presidents and even the current External Affairs Minister is a Muslim.

The paper pointed out that due to the campaign of discrimination and atrocities there has been an exodus of 16 million minorities to India since 1971, who live there as stateless people for India doesn’t grant asylum to Bangladesh’s minorities and thus they were not economic migrants, which is what has been claimed by the agents of BNP and Jamaat, who have consistently denied that minority persecution has ever occurred in Bangladesh.

Having thus very fairly criticizing all the political parties and arguing that perpetrators of crime against the minorities are primarily the cadres of BNP and Jamaat, Dr. Bhattacharjya profusely praised Awami League for completely separating the state and Mosque/Church and for Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s stellar records in combating terrorism, women empowerment, child mortality, economic development, generation of electricity, etc and that her government does not bar the promotions due to the minorities which is why they vote for the secularists and that he himself would also vote for Awami League, if he were to go back to Bangladesh. He clearly let the ambassador know that, as in every nation, the minorities always tend to vote for the relatively more secular party and they will thus vote for Awami League and its allies, as would he himself.

Dr. Bhattacharjya, gratefully acknowledged the assistance the secular democratic people of Bangladesh have provide whenever the minorities have have come under attack by the cadres of BNP and jamaat and pointed out that in every country the minorities have been able to survive and even regain their rights only with the help of the secular democratic forces of the majority group and that the same is the case in Bangladesh, too.

Having said that, he urged the Ambassador to support the secular democratic forces in Bangladesh and roll the country back into a secular democratic state like his predecessor Ambassador Moriarty did in Nepal.

He pointed out that the religious minorities of Bangladesh looked up to the United States to device a permanent solution because it has done so all over the world, e.g., in East Timor, South Sudan, Bosnia and the likes.

Dr. Bhattacharjya suggested that the US take the following steps to accomplish that goal:

i. Advise BNP and Jamat-E- Islami to end their vicious campaign of religious & ethnic cleansing in Bangladesh.

ii. Advise Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to take precautionary measures whenever attacks on the minorities are anticipated, and not use them to show the world how evil the BNP and Jamaat are for the world already knows that.

iii. Encourage Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to constitutionally uphold secular democracy (as opposed to Islamic democracy that her party has perpetuated by reaffirming Islam as the state religion through the 15th Amendment to the constitution).

iv. Encourage Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to enact a Hate Crime Law and try the perpetrators of crime against the country’s minorities under that law in a special tribunal, starting the process using the Justice Shahabuddin Report or Probe Commission report.

v. Encourage Prime Minister Hasina to create separate foundations for the Hindus, Buddhists and Christians like the existing Islamic foundation.

vi. Encourage Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to complete the trial and punishment of the perpetrators of crimes against humanity (If this is done the Islamist will not dare conduct pogroms against the minorities and secular Muslims of the country. Trial of those criminals is as non-negotiable as that of the Nazis, RSS and).

vii. Encourage Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to empower the country’s minorities politically and economically.

viii. Advise Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to rehabilitate and compensate the victims of violence by rebuilding their places of worship, dwelling houses that have ever been destroyed by the religious nationalists and extremists, and making arrangements for dealing with their psychological trauma.

ix. Encourage Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina ban religious extremists parties like Jamaat-e-Islami, Islami Chatra Shibir and Islami Oikya Jote who have links to terrorist activities as per proposal of European Parliament.

x. Advise Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to fully implement the Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord of 1997, so the indigenous peoples of Chittagong Hill tracts may live in peace.

xi. Encourage Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to empower the country’s minorities politically and economically (Please note that, in her current cabinet there is not a single full minister from among the minority groups.)

xii. Consistently promote and support the secular democratic forces.

xiii. Provide a permanent solution to the problems facing the minorities of Bangladesh like you did in East Timor, South Sudan, Bosnia and the likes.

Dr. Bhattacharjya ended the presentation of the position paper by reiterating three requests to the Hon. Ambassador:

i. Consistently promote and support the secular democratic forces in Bangladesh.

ii. Roll Bangladesh back into a secular democracy that it was at birth.

iii. Device a permanent solution to the problem facing Bangladesh’s religious and ethnic minorities.

Professor Sachi Dastidar’s valuable paper focused on the minority exodus of over 50 million people under duress, which was supported by a detailed statistical analysis, very much like the papers he previously presented at two Congressional Hearings in Washington D.C., in 2008 and 2011.

Ms. Sathi Roy’s insightful paper focused on the use of rape and conversion as tools of choice in the campaign of religious and ethnic cleansing. It argued that when these tools are used in combination the victims have no alternative but to leave the country because no parents want to witness their daughters violated again and again in front of their eyes.

Responding to the presentations, Ambassador Mozena held the hands of the introducer from the young generation, Attorney Rakesh Roy and Akash Das, and said, they were the future of Bangladesh.


He said having traveled throughout Bangladesh he noticed that at the deeper level the majority group was willing to live side by side with the minorities as they have for centuries; however that he has also witnessed this harmony disrupted through violence against the minorities again and again, in 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, etc. He argued that in order to maintain that history of peaceful coexistence Bangladesh’s majority group must respect the rights and dignity of the minorities. He said a few times that he personally believed and also it was the U. S. policy to protect the minorities everywhere. The ambassador said that Bangladesh could not make progress complete neglecting the minorities, and hence minority persecution must stop.

The Hon. Ambassador said he believed in Lord Krishna’s statement that he is present inside every human being, and thus he believes that people must love each other. He ended his speech by thanking BHBC, USA for hosting this event.

In the question/Answer session, Dr. Jiten Roy asked: “We hear that another election might be held soon. But experience shows that, another election is unlikely to help the democratic process because the opposition parties never go to the parliament. What another election would certainly do is cause another wave of atrocities against the country’s minorities followed by yet another wave of minority exodus. So, what would be the point of another election soon?

The ambassador skillfully avoided this question.

The meeting ended with the thank You note from Mr. Ranabir Barua, President who had previously introuduced Councilman Weprin to the audience.

Finally, on a different note we would like our fellow human rights advocates/ activistsworldwide to know that, the man who has created counter-Oikya Parishad committees in various places defying the central committee yet claiming that he was the international coordinator of this organization, and who had his surrogate writers write articles in New York's weeklies likening Major General C.R. Datta to the traitors Jogendra Mandal and Rasaraj Mandal and then e-mailed to most of you in order to defame him ( He also did the same thing with the General Secretary of the Central Committee Advocate RananDas-Gupta the prosecutor of Delwar Hossain Syedee and Salhauddin Qader Chowdhury), simply because they refused to make Oikya Parishad a tool for promoting the his political masters, called many people of New York City trying to dissuade them from coming to our event. Recipients of that villain’s call contacted us one after another to find out what was going on, but did show up, thus overcrowding the hall, and raising the number of attendees to well above 350 ( Journalists told us they never saw so many people show up at a meeting so early in the morning and then attend it for three hours on their feet.)

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Mr. Rup Kumar Bhowmick, Director Communications & Publications

On Behalf of

Presidents: Dr. Jiten Roy Ph. D., Mr. Julius Gomez & Mr. Ranabir Barua

General Secretary: Dwijen Bhattacharjya, Ph. D. & Treasurer: Mr. Dilip Chakraborty

Chairman/Board of Directors: Mr. Shyamal Sharma

Vice Chairman/Board of Directors: Mr. Bidyut Das

Members Secretary: Mr. Ranjit Bhaduri

Director Policy : Mr. Amit Chowdhury & Director Organizaiton: Mr. Bappi Sen Chowdhury