https://www.dawn.com/news/1523612 December 22, 2019
Tuesday, December 24, 2019
https://www.dawn.com/news/1523612 December 22, 2019
Monday, December 16, 2019
After WW II did the West and America treat Jews & Gypsies migration the same way as the thugs who took over their homes and killed them?
Here are a few of the writings that we have received:
India's home minister Amit Shah has brought the issue of anti-minority violence in Bangladesh on discussion about "Citizenship Amendment Bill" who took the name of BNP's for minority torture in Bangladesh. BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Alamgir has expressed anger in Dhaka. Amit Shah said, " if you want, I can send proof. In another context, mirza fakhrul said, " minorities were protected during the BNP period. Awami League General Secretary Obaidul Quader said, "I don't understand whether I will laugh or cry. He said, the minorities were safe during the Awami League period. Foreign Minister Dr. Abdul Momen went another step forward, "There is no example of Hindu torture in Bangladesh.” I am hung up in the condition of these three leaders, I don't understand whether I will laugh or cry.
In The Lok Sabha of India, Dr. Dip, MP of Silchar, said with a loud voice, "my father left everything and fled from Sylhet in the darkness of the night to save life.” Actress and BJP leader Rupa Ganguly said, "I had to run from Bangladesh wearing borkha.” Bangladesh is talking about minority torture in Bangladesh. Maybe more will rise. But there is no talk about this in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly and the parliament of Bangladesh. Most of the MLA of West Bengal or Tripura Legislative Assembly have fled east-Pakistan or today's Bangladesh in the darkness of night, but why did you come, why did you come, why did you come, why did you come? Tripura Chief Minister Biplab himself is an example; his clan is still in Chandpur? Jyoti Basu of Narayanganj, Buddha Dev Bhattacharya, Nobel Laureate Dr. Amartya Sen or singer Nachiketa, everyone has escaped, but they have never opened their mouth. The West Bengal Legislative Assembly has not spent a single word for the Hindus of Bangladesh in the past or over the years!
Now there are 18 + minority MP in Bangladesh's Parliament. It was a long time ago. Have never heard of minority torture in any of them except by Suranjit Sengupta? There are many reasons; the main reason is, 'fear'? They are afraid that if prime minister Sheikh Hasina gets angry if he speaks on behalf of his own nation? If she gets angry, both mango and skin will go! If asked, their "excuse" that they are Awami League's MP, not a minority. Maybe there is logic in the words, but they do not open their mouth to be a party MP, even though they know that they can speak in favor of the party? The Prime Minister will get angry, who knows where they got such guarantee? A Prime Minister has to manage all sides. If Hindu journalists were talking about Nasirnagar, Rangpur or big incidents, the prime minister might have got the opportunity to take electoral action against the fundamentalist?
The situation of minority ministers is worse. How many minority ministers who have been in the history of Bangladesh in eight years of history, have questions about the qualification of others except Phaṇibhūṣaṇa Majumdar, Niranjan Dhar, or Suranjit Sengupta? Once upon a time, there was a minister named Sunil Gupta, he gave bamboo to Hindus. Now what is the use of minister chief Chandra Chandra or Hindu, who knows? Sadly, however, it is true that all the government apart from bangabandhu's period has made or made a number of ministers who do not represent minority, or do not make two-words, or their only qualification ' Loyalty '? At this time, even in a communal state like Pakistan, we are waiting, when will they open their mouth in the parliament of Bangladesh! They know why the majority do not speak in the purse, but they ought to speak. If you don't speak, the words of the late: he said, " AWAMI LEAGUE - BNP BROTHER - BROTHER - BROTHER-in-law is going to be true!! He said, AWAMI LEAGUE - BNP brother and brother. After 2001, is there a lot of difference between BNP's Hindu torture and Hindu torture during the last eleven years?
CAB or NRC is internal matter of India. It is normal to be in Bangladesh. The obvious reason is that a large number of Bangladeshi people are living in India. People from Bangladesh have gone to India or still going, it is stupidity to deny it. We are the only ones who say, 'there were fifty houses Hindu in our village, now there are 5 HOUSES'? Same image everywhere? After the CAB, the non-State refugees who have taken refuge in India will find a state, maybe they will open their mouths, maybe they will open their mouths. However, no one was supposed to go to India according to Mujib-Indira Treaty. There is a lot of talk about cab now, such as Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan has said that India is moving towards Hinduism by CAB. The Prime Minister of the terrorist state is giving 'lesson' to others? Can any country in OIC give a 'lesson' to India? India is not yet a Hindu state, it does not have a state religion! But they are giving 'knowledge' on the head of communal state or state religion. Taslima Nasrin that's why she wrote, if there were so many Muslim countries in the world, then what is the loss if India is a Hindu state?
There is damage. If India is a Hindu state, the minorities of that country may be damaged. Bangladesh, Pakistan, or other Muslim countries understand that, so they are trying to be careful to protect the interests of Muslims. The problem is that they will remain a religious state, say, ninety percent of Muslims will continue in the country of the country, while they suggest others to be liberal, democratic, isn't it? What do you think other religious people will drive out from their own country, but what do you think if others want to follow their footsteps? Is it a rule to teach 'your religion'? Taslima Nasrin tweeted, " many countries in the world don't want to take Muslims anymore Why is it happening? I asked a question to a BJP leader who came to America in the country of 'hundred crores of Hindus, what do you need to do to say Hindu Hindu in the country of' hundred crores of Hindus?’ He said,' if you can say Islam Islam in Pakistan and Bangladesh, then where is the fault to say Hindu Hindu here?’ Today, for Hindus in India, the violence of the Islamic Muslims in Bangladesh or Pakistan is probably the benefit of deny?
Just a few days ago, several people were detained at the BGP border guards. BJP said that they are illegal chap. The Police investigate that they are Bangladeshi citizens. Went to India in search of work, it came back again. This is the reality. Here both BJP and police are correct. It will be called "invalid entry" without valid documents. Investigation is not the work of bgb, it is the work of the police. The police have investigated, they are Bangladeshi. They went back to India for economic reasons, now they are back to the "economy rules" as well as the economy of Bangladesh. Minorities but did not go to India for economic reasons, because of torture and security. Meanwhile, the foreign minister of Bangladesh's Foreign Minister Dr. Carmen's visit to India has been cancelled. Amit Shah's statement, "Hindus are being tortured in Bangladesh he said," cab will weaken India's secular character Alas, there is no news of secularism in our own country, doesn't our foreign minister sleep about the secularism of India? The people of our country have wasted a lot of time about India, the last six decades are watching so. In fact, we should take a look at how to turn Bangladesh into a modern secular, Democratic, human welfare state.
আপডেট: ১৩ ডিসেম্বর ২০১৯, ১৩:৪৩
A Goggle Translation: